Crossbook
live

Will Darline Graham Nordone win Richland County in the South Carolina Special Senate Primary runoff?

Crossbook compares what two exchanges, Polymarket and Kalshi, charge for the same event, and publishes a permanent scored record of its own forecasts under published rules.

Tracked on one venue, with Crossbook's own call on the record.

SettledContract settles 25 Aug 2026Last checked 25 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC
PM

Bid/ask midpoint · retrieved 2026-08-25T23:55:07.138Z. Venue quote-update time is unavailable. Readings can be asynchronous.

96.8%bid 94.1% / ask 99.4%24h volume $3K · liquidity $718as of 25 Aug, 23:55 UTC · not refreshed recentlyView on Polymarket

Crossbook forecast

87.0%against a market price of 93.5% at the timeYES

Logged 23 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC · Brier 0.0169

  • Outside view: runoff favorites leading after the first round win most of the time, but upsets in low-turnout special-election runoffs are not rare (10-20%), capping justified confidence below the market's 93.5%.
  • Inside view is thin: I lack verified polling, first-round margins, or endorsement data for this specific Richland County race, so I anchor mostly on the reference class rather than case-specific signal; the fact that the question is framed around her suggests she is the perceived frontrunner, which is modest signal.
  • Time-decay is minimal (3 days to close, election imminent), so late-scandal risk is compressed but not zero; low 24h volume ($7.2k) means the 93.5% price may partly reflect thin liquidity and informed local money rather than a robust consensus, plausibly explaining the gap to my estimate.
  • My independent estimate sits a few points below the market because systematic base rates for heavy favorites argue against 93%+ absent confirmed polling dominance, which I cannot verify.

What would change it: A late-breaking endorsement reversal, scandal, or a verified poll showing her trailing would move this sharply; conversely, confirmed double-digit polling leads would push me toward the market's 93%+.

Settlement source

-6.5 probability points from the market at generation · low confidence · Polymarket

Base rate: First-round leaders and polling favorites in U.S. primary runoffs historically win roughly 70-85% of the time, with heavily favored candidates in low-salience local runoffs resolving as expected at the higher end.

Chosen by hand.

Settlement

Every answer this call has been given, oldest first. Nothing is edited: a correction is a new entry beside the one it replaces.

  1. YESsettled 26 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC · recorded 26 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC · entered by handsettlement

  2. YESsettled 27 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC · recorded 5 Oct 2026, 01:23 UTC · read from the venuesettlement

    Corrected against Polymarket's settlement. It was recorded as settled on 26 Aug 2026, before Polymarket settled it on 27 Aug 2026.

Polymarket prices this at 96.8%. No verified equivalent is currently listed on the other venue, so there is no cross venue comparison on this page.

Volume over the last 24 hours is modest, at about $2,694 on the busier venue.

This market has settled. The page is kept as a record of what the market said while the question was open, and of what Crossbook called.

Related markets

Crossbook publishes every forecast it makes, timestamped before the answer is known and scored against the market afterwards. See the public record and the rules it is held to.

This call is line t-0042 of the public append-only ledger, committed when it was published. It appears on the record alongside every other call, resolved and open.